⚡️ Speed up method DiscreteUniformDistribution._asdict by 702%
#46
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 702% (7.02x) speedup for
DiscreteUniformDistribution._asdictinoptuna/distributions.py⏱️ Runtime :
3.09 milliseconds→386 microseconds(best of214runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces
copy.deepcopy(self.__dict__)withself.__dict__.copy()in the_asdictmethod. This change delivers a 702% speedup because:What changed: Switched from deep copy to shallow copy for creating a dictionary copy.
Why it's faster: The
DiscreteUniformDistributioninstance dictionary only contains immutable values (floats and a boolean:low,high,step,log). Since there are no nested mutable objects to recursively copy,deepcopyperforms unnecessary overhead by:A shallow copy with
.copy()is sufficient and much faster since it only needs to create a new dictionary with references to the same immutable values.Performance impact: The line profiler shows the bottleneck was the
copy.deepcopycall taking 95.4% of the method's time (20.98ms out of 21.9ms). The optimized version reduces this to just 27.3% (430μs out of 1.58ms).Test case benefits: All test cases show consistent 5-7x speedups, with the optimization being particularly effective for:
_asdictis called repeatedly, as the per-call overhead is dramatically reducedThe optimization maintains identical behavior since both approaches return a mutable copy that doesn't affect the original instance when modified.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_qluqolhr/tmpbo9m53yg/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_DiscreteUniformDistribution__asdictTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-DiscreteUniformDistribution._asdict-mhbi5380and push.